We created one subscription product with reference name plus_1_month, as part of subscription group super_users
Now we try to fetch this product using flutter https://pub.dev/packages/in_app_purchase
const Set _kIds = {'1_month'};
final ProductDetailsResponse response =
await InAppPurchase.instance.queryProductDetails(_kIds);
but response is product not found.
Have some questions here:
What is my inapppurchase identifier ? there is one field reference_name another product_id (mentioning is used for reporting only)
How can we even test in app purchases if first the product needs review ? (we see missing metadata message and requiring screenshoots and review information... which we cannot have as cannot develop now due to not having any test product being able to get fetched)
Screenshoot below shows the status...
How can we test or implement this if first required screenshoots and reviews.
Got stuck in implementing app purchases since 2 weeks
I even tried getting all id reference_name combinations still no luck...
For the moment have no idea how to implement the inapppurchase for ios
Post
Replies
Boosts
Views
Activity
As the title says, since last week I cannot distribute app in app store or ad-hoc because xcode gets stuck at screen shown as below:
We need urgent help, as need to test and release new app version, but got stuck due to this problem
Thanks
Hi everyone,
we have published our app successfully in app store, but in the details section we see as supported language only English which is wrong.
(the details for a particular app at https://apps.apple.com/app/id{hereourappid}}
The description is as follows and we can notice in languages is only English listed which is wrong!!! we offer other languages too
Compatibility Requires iOS 8.0 or later. Compatible with iPhone, iPad, and iPod touch.
Languages English
Age Rating 17+
Infrequent/Mild ****** Content and Nudity
Frequent/Intense Mature/Suggestive Themes
We offer more then just English in our app.
How and where can I modify and add the other languages aside English, so they are also displayed in the description in app store ?
I want to open the app store directly when a user is interested in reviewing my app, and am doing this
NSString *iTunesLink = [NSString stringWithFormat:@"itms-apps://itunes.apple.com/app/id%@?action=write-review", appId];
NSURL* itunesURL = [NSURL URLWithString:iTunesLink];
bool canOpen = [[UIApplication sharedApplication] canOpenURL:itunesURL];
if (canOpen) {
[[UIApplication sharedApplication] openURL:itunesURL];
}
The above canOpen variable is always false!!!
In the info.plilist we alreay list the itms and itms-apps scheme
<key>LSApplicationQueriesSchemes</key>
<array>
	 <string>itms</string>
	 <string>itms-apps</string>
</array>
Any input on this and why this is returning always false and we cannot open the app store ?
Hi,
we submitted our app for review after 1 year of development, and 4 months waiting to finally make payment and enable developer account.
After review, app was rejected for 4.3 reason design spam as there are already lots of dating apps in the store reason.
We have a unique audience and features (of course also common features like other dating as cannot be avoided chat, some like function etc), and a lof of users were looking forward to our ios version, they are still using the web and ask us every day when they can use ios app.
App got rejected and what is unfair is that we can mention at least 5 apps that are total trash in terms of features that do exist in app store same category and are our "rivals" published without any problem.
We submitted after 2 weeks a totally new concept for the app, new menus, animations etc to make it more unique so is not anymore under design spam.
Now it was rejected again for same reason and we are out of ideas what to change for the next submission.
Our designers and developers read all the documentations multiple times and we still have no idea what to change more.
The only thing I can think of is to keep add more features...
Any help with this or ideas from other devs ?
As I mentioned what is totally unfair is that a lot of other apps are published!!! and are very basic, even without reset password functionality, nothing totally empty.
This is completely crazy and unfair when you put 1 year work, would be totally fine if same game rules would be applied for all apps