Be careful, don't submit the same package, and then you can only wait. Good luck

After communicating over the phone, although I listed tools with similar concepts in the App Store that can pass the review, the Apple review team will not explain any other applications and reasons to you during the communication, so it needs attention. However, from the minimum function of 4.2, the definition is very vague, and the problem lies here.

me too. Although a similar review of the App Store is possible, the Apple review team will not explain any other applications and reasons to you during the communication, so it needs attention. But from the minimum characteristics of 4.2, the definition is very vague, and the problem lies here.

Yes, I also repeatedly rejected the 4.2 minimum feature. This hurts real developers, and I dare not try new creative development because I don't know if it will be available on the shelves. May not get any help. At present, I am suspending the development of this IOS project side. Good luck.

Hmm, an app that collects the App Store, users can bookmark their favorite apps through the share menu. Here are some introductions, but not listed. The main groups are designers, product managers。https://www.bytepai.com

Thanks for the reply, 4. 2 Design: Minimum Functionality Guideline was rejected, the app was developed by SWIFT, and it also kept the latest features in design. Through observation, the Apple review team did not seem to have test data, it was rejected, and communication by phone was invalid....

After two months of modification, it is always rejected. This is too bad for real developers. For our start-up companies, the time cost is too great. I decided to abandon the IOS development project or make a WeChat applet.

As an independent developer, I spent a lot of energy to implement it. The program uses golang + mongodb + swift5.