App Review rejected due to Guideline 4.3(a) - Design - Spam App Store Distribution & Marketing

Hello,

My app was rejected because of App Review Guideline 4.3(a). The guideline says: "Don’t create multiple Bundle IDs of the same app. If your app has different versions for specific locations, sports teams, universities, etc., consider submitting a single app and provide the variations using in-app purchase."

The original answer is: "We noticed your app shares a similar binary, metadata, and/or concept as apps submitted to the App Store by other developers, with only minor differences. Submitting similar or repackaged apps is a form of spam that creates clutter and makes it difficult for users to discover new apps."

I am very confused. I just bought a Mac and iPhone So I don't have other apps in the Apple App Store. I created my app all by myself and did not repacked another apps or similar procedure. I have only one bundle id.

There is one app with a similar concept in the store which unfortunately has the name "weapon mods for gmod". So I renamed my app for iOS to " map addons for gmod to addons for gmod". The difference is that this app give mods regarding Garry's game and redirect user to the steam community and my app has provided different category of mods rather than others and my app has functionality for that user have not to redirect any website From my understanding my app is relatively unique in concept.

Anyway I don't understand why my app is rejected. The uploaded version does not contain In-App-Purchase, Achievement, Leaderboard and Sharing like the Android version does because it is still work in progress. I admit the uploaded screenshots are polished and final.

I don't know how "shares similar binaries, metadata" with other apps can be fixed if this is the case. It is because I used Unity like most developers and this results in similar filename?

Anyone can help?

Kind regards,

Jay limbani

Thank you for your post and appeal. We're investigating this currently. A representative from App Review will contact you shortly to provide further assistance. If you continue to experience issues during review, please contact us.

Thanks Jay_limbani for this topic, I'm facing this issue as well. Let me borrow your topic to ask Apple App Review Team to assit me, hope you don't mind. Appreciate and thank you.

Submission ID : c845d491-a9e6-46b2-81d1-acb659cf55c6

" Dear App Review Team,

I hope this message finds you well.

Harmonian is not just another app; it’s a heartfelt effort to create a platform where individuals facing life’s challenges can find support, guidance, and hope. It is a unique, ad-free space focused on fostering mental well-being, empathy, and positive engagement—unlike entertainment-driven or generic platforms. Our mission is to make a meaningful difference by helping people connect, share, and uplift one another in a safe and harmonious environment.

I understand your concerns under Guideline 4.3(a) regarding similarities with other apps. While certain features may seem familiar, I assure you that Harmonian is fundamentally different in its purpose, execution, and user experience. It is built with a focus on personal growth and positive community interactions, setting it apart from other platforms.

I firmly believe Apple shares a similar vision—to empower and assist people worldwide. Approving Harmonian would allow us to reach those who need help and support the most. Apple’s commitment to quality and innovation inspires me, and I am dedicated to aligning Harmonian with these high standards.

I humbly ask for your reconsideration and approval of my app. Additionally, I kindly request a phone conversation to discuss and clarify any concerns. A direct discussion would help me address your feedback effectively and demonstrate Harmonian's unique value.

Thank you for reviewing this appeal. I deeply appreciate your time and guidance.

Warm regards, Bryan Lum Founder of Harmonian "

App Review rejected due to Guideline 4.3(a) - Design - Spam App Store Distribution & Marketing
 
 
Q