At what stage do you just abort a review and create a new submission?
I've run into a "not-so-stellar" reviewer on a rather minor update. First it was rejected based on two grounds:
- an allegedly non-working feature
- meta data mentioning an allegedly pre-release feature
After pointing out the wrongly tested feature (left me speechless) and providing public evidence of the feature not being pre-release, the reviewer reverted to "in-review" to confirm the policy on the meta data.
It's now been a week. Since there is no way to communicate or poke anyone...
What's the best course of action?
Just abort the current review, and submit a new version in hope to get a better reviewer?
How do you deal with these kind of situations?
This is such a frustrating process.