Post

Replies

Boosts

Views

Activity

Reply to notarization: ".pkg could not be extracted."
I found the issue: a line choice was missing for a given choice element. Now the thing is that productbuild does not complain as well as it never returns an error value once the distribution.xml has passed checks for formal xml correctness. The notarization issue is cryptic enough to let me spend days on investigation. And it's certainly not my first .pkg installer... Thanks anyways!
1w
Reply to productbuild: notarize .pkg with non-binary sub package
Thanks Quinn, for your reply! Subpackages are only notarized within our overall product. They are not notarized independently. Because reading your text I get the impression that it’s the latter, but the notary log snippet you posted doesn’t show any nesting. isn't this the indication: "message": "b\"Invalid component package: mypackage_vstpreset Distribution file's value: #com.mycompany.mypackage.vstpreset.pkg\\n\"", its the com.mycompany.mypackage.vstpreset.pkg that contains the non-binary preset files. Thanks
Sep ’24
Reply to valid range for thread_policy_set(thread_time_constraint_policy_data_t)
Thank you very much, Quinn, We need to set the thread priority for our streaming engine. Our unit tests are testing its modules - beneath other things - with all kinds of (unrealistic) sample rates. And it tries to set thread priorities for standard sample rates like 44.1kHz, 48kHz, ..., 192kHz, etc. while setting up the streaming engine to run on block sizes from 1 sample to something like 16384, which means the thread needs to be set up for computation down to every 1/44100, 1/192000 sec, etc. IIRC setting the thread_policy below 4/44100 fails. Although this is (for our current tasks) not a very realistic scenario, I think it should work, at least I would like to know how low the unit tests can go, or even better be able to ask the specific machine about its valid thread_policy range.
May ’24
Reply to CoreAudio server plugin RunLoop for MatchingNotification
Thanks for giving the space to get lost in soliloquies! After this breathing practice, I would now like to get back to work and finish the exercise, for example with the help of an appropriate documentation or a hint from the people behind the API/technology. Or you could also just tell me that your operating system does not need my support, then I could go straight to the beach and wouldn't need to wait for the bus here.
Mar ’22
Reply to USB interface iterator broken @ USB device match notification in 10.14
Thanks, for giving me the chance to soliloquy. The issue persists in Bug Sur, we have worked around this by requesting a USBDeviceReEnumerate(); This continues to work on M1 for some USB devices, while for others the interface iterator is still empty and is not getting filled by any magic we tried. In this case the USB device is pretty simple it has a single configuration with 2 interfaces. What is the cause for this and can this be fixed/worked around?
Jun ’21
Reply to unified logging corrupted
Thanks again,yep you were right. I don't know why I didn't see them.Unfortunately restarting either/both of the demons does not reset the logging system in a way so it cures the garbled output...BTW. Its not only garbled, it seems also that the logging system accesses the log string at the wrong memory position. Here it seems that it reads the format string at a position skipping the string start which contained %s (to display the denoted string parameter)...<decode: mismatch for [%x] got [STRING sz:59]>] {I am bit clueless right now, since logging is a very valueable and neccesary way of developing/debuggin kernel code. Often its not even possible/manageable to connect a debugger...What can I do to progress here?Thanks & cheers,Hagen
Mar ’20
Reply to unified logging corrupted
Thanks Quinn,that seems to be true for Catalina (even for the man page - great, I am impressed...!!!), and there its named properly,but not for Mojave (and unfortunately I am still bound to Mojave for some reasons like svn support, I still need Xcode 9 - while running current Xcode in parallel).What would be the name of the unified logging process in Mojave?Thanks & cheers,Hagen.
Mar ’20