Post

Replies

Boosts

Views

Activity

Guideline 4.3(a) - Design - Spam
尊敬的苹果审核官 您好 1.我们按照审核要求,这次提交审核中我们重新建了一个Xcode 项目,重构了代码功能及结构,删除了没用到的第三方库,图片资源、功能模块。 2.好多之前没用到的第三方库,资源已经被删除掉了,我们不明白为什么还会有 4.3 的审核意见,希望苹果审查官给一些详细改进意见。 3.为了能上线苹果市场,我们已经花费大量的精力,时间在配合更正 一些产品功能,开发人员加班加点的弄了好几周时间,希望审查官能给一些明确的改进意见,非常感谢。 4.期待digibuy应用能早日的审核上线,不枉费大家的共同努力。
0
0
1k
Jun ’24
4.3
Hello, Thank you for your efforts to follow our guidelines. There are still some issues that need your attention. If you have any questions, we are here to help. Reply to this message in App Store Connect and let us know. Review Environment Submission ID: 10286862-58d0-4abf-a767-24b885a8a25c Review date: June 17, 2024 Version reviewed: 1.0.0 Guideline 4.3(a) - Design - Spam We noticed your app shares a similar binary, metadata, and/or concept as apps submitted to the App Store by other developers, with only minor differences. Submitting similar or repackaged apps is a form of spam that creates clutter and makes it difficult for users to discover new apps. Next Steps Since we do not accept spam apps on the App Store, we encourage you to review your app concept and submit a unique app with distinct content and functionality. Resources Some factors that contribute to a spam rejection may include: Submitting an app with the same source code or assets as other apps already submitted to the App Store Creating and submitting multiple similar apps using a repackaged app template Purchasing an app template with problematic code from a third party Submitting several similar apps across multiple accounts Learn more about our requirements to prevent spam in App Review Guideline 4.3(a). Support Reply to this message in your preferred language if you need assistance. If you need additional support, use the Contact Us module. Consult with fellow developers and Apple engineers on the Apple Developer Forums. Help improve the review process or identify a need for clarity in our policies by suggesting guideline changes.
0
0
426
Jun ’24