I've implemented a custom system extension VPN for macOS using a Packet Tunnel Provider. At the Protocol Configuration, the 'includeAllNetworks' flag is unset. At the provider, I included all routes (IPv4 default route). What is the expected behavior for LAN traffic? Should the LAN traffic go via the VPN? By 'LAN traffic', I'm referring to local hosts, ssh, printer access, etc.

I've implemented a custom VPN for iOS using a Packet Tunnel Provider. I have the entitlement for 'com.apple.managed.vpn.shared'. One option to connect is to use a certificate - this can be done by distributing a VPN payload with the required certificate for the connection. My question is if there's any way to distribute multiple certificates and that I'll be able to read them on my iOS app. For example, on the Certificates payload, I can add multiple certificates, but on the VPN payload, I can choose only one of them. So, can my app read more than one certificate?

Is it possible to have both 'includeAllNetworks' and split-tunnel simultaneously? I want to enable a split tunnel so only some of the traffic will reach the tunnel, but at the same time, to make sure that the above traffic will always reach the tunnel - even if it's coming from some low-level networking API or even if the traffic started before creating the tunnel. Setting the 'includeAllNetworks' flag will help with the above cases, but then I'll get all the traffic via the tunnel without consideration in the split tunnel configuration. (Details: System-extension, PacketTunnelProvider)

[Network Extension, Packet Tunnel Provider, iOS, split tunnel] I've implemented a custom network extension app for iOS using Packet Tunnel Provider. A customer enabled a split tunnel, set the tunnel's DNS servers, and added relevant 'search domains' and 'match domains'. Then, he reported an error related to DNS, specifically, DNS Over HTTPS. He noticed that DNS queries were sent over HTTPS. He also has the corresponding app for Mac (Packet Tunnel Provider, macOS, system extension), and everything works fine with the same DNS configuration, and the DNS queries were sent as a 'clear text', not DoH. Is DoH the default behavior on iOS? Is it the default on macOS? Can we somehow change this behavior? Are DoH queries reach the tunnel as plain DNS queries?

I downloaded the ES sys-ext sample project. I built the 'NOTIFY' extension, and I was able to install it. However, it doesn't seem to work (or - it doesn't report anything). This is what I did: I download the project I renamed the bundle IDs I disabled SIP I tried both signing options - let 'Xcode automatically manage signing', and I also tried to use my 'Developer ID' I moved the app to the Applications folder I grant the 'Full Disk Access' permission to the extension I verified that the extension is running I did not get the needed entitlement yet, but since SIP is disabled, I don't think it's a problem I did get the message 'Successfully installed the extension ✅' At the terminal, I tried to capture relevant logs: log stream --style compact --predicate 'sender == "myBundleId"' (I tried it with the app bundleID, and with the extension's bundleId) And yet, 'ps' triggers no logs. *At the Console, I get those messages: "Unsatisfied entitlements: com.apple.developer.endpoint-security.client" Disallowing: myBundleId amfid: Restricted entitlements not validated, bailing out. Error: Error Domain=AppleMobileFileIntegrityError Code=-413 "No matching profile found" UserInfo={NSURL=, unsatisfiedEntitlements=, NSLocalizedDescription=No matching profile found} Any idea where's the problem at?

Now that the flag includeAllNetworks is working as expected (see https://developer.apple.com/forums/thread/722156), I tried to set it and also the ExcludeLocalNetworks flag. As described in the documentation, I'm able to use AirPlay and AirDrop while being connected, but what I was hoping for was to exclude from the tunnel all the LAN traffic, including pings to local hosts, ssh, printer access, etc. Isn't it what ExcludeLocalNetworks should accomplish? If not, how can I exclude LAN traffic from a full tunnel (i.e. not a split tunnel)? [Custom VPN, macOS, Packet Tunnel Provider, system extension]

Is it possible to distribute my custom system extension VPN for macOS via the App Store? Or can the system extension be distributed only via 'independent' distribution?

I've implemented a custom VPN for macOS (system extension, Packet Tunnel Provider). My question is related to the tunnel's DNS servers: I would like that even when a split-tunnel is enabled, all DNS queries will reach the tunnel's DNS, but I'm aware that this case is not 'working well', and the Packet Tunnel Provider is not supposed to capture all DNS queries, see those threads:https://developer.apple.com/forums/thread/662443, https://developer.apple.com/forums/thread/661601 So as a workaround, on a split-tunnel I have a list of 'match domains', and 'search domains'. But now it seems that the default interface will answer those queries as well, and they still won't reach the tunnel's DNS. To verify this, I connected with the VPN, and when I checked 'scutil --dns', I got the list of resolvers, where resolver #1, wasn't the utun (it was en7), and it handled all the 'match domain'/'search domains'. Any idea how to force some/add DNS queries to the tunnel's DNS even when for a split tunnel?

I've implemented a custom VPN for macOS (system extension, Packet Tunnel Provider). I've configured disconnectOnSleep = false, and at the Provider I've implemented the sleep() and wake() functions. At the wake() func, I'm trying to re-establish the connection, and most of the time it's working well. However, there are times when even after wake() is called, it seems that the interfaces aren't ready/available, and I'm getting "Network is unreachable" errors (I'm working with BSD Sockets). Any idea why the interfaces aren't available at this point, after wake() had been called? Any idea on how to be updated when the interfaces are available?

I have a question very similar to this one, from 5 years ago: https://developer.apple.com/forums/thread/75710 I have a macOS app, in which I have a webview, which loads a login page for the user. The user can log in using an SSO, and the SSO login process might require verifying that a certificate is installed on the user's machine. The certificate and the user login credentials aren't related to my app in any way. The certificate should be already installed at the Keychain. My question is related to the function webView(_ webView: WKWebView, didReceive challenge:) Should I implement this function? As I said, the certificate is not related to my app, so it would be better to let the OS handle the challenge, if possible. In case I have to implement this function, is there any way for my app to answer this challenge? Any example on how to do it?

I've implemented a custom VPN system extension for macOS (Packet Tunnel Provider). I created a tunnel, and I have a VPN connection, with the default (IPv4) routes. My question is about sending traffic which was originated at the extension, via the tunnel. Is it possible to create a BSD socket at the extension, and bind it to a specific interface, so the traffic (that was created from the extension) for this socket will be routed via the tunnel?

I've implemented a custom system-extension VPN (Packet Tunnel Provider) for macOS. At the extension, I need to use a 3rd party dynamic lib. The steps I did: Build phases: Copy files, with Frameworks destination Link Binary With Libraries Build Settings: I set 'Dynamic Library Install Name', 'Dynamic Library Install Name Base', and 'Library Search Path' to the lib folder I set 'Header Search Path' to the headers folder But when running the extension, it's crashing with the error Termination Reason: Namespace DYLD, Code 1 Library missing Library not loaded: @loader_path/somelib.dylib And Reason: tried: '/Library/SystemExtensions/A1111-someID-11111/com.myapp.myappSysExtension.systemextension/Contents/MacOS/libwavmodapi.dylib' (no such file), '/usr/local/lib/libwavmodapi.dylib' (no such file), '/usr/lib/libwavmodapi.dylib' (no such file) (terminated at launch; ignore backtrace) Any idea what I'm doing wrong here? Also, is it even possible to use dynamic libs from a sys-ext?

I have some questions regarding life cycle of Packet Tunnel Provider: I have some static vars at the PacketTunnelProvider. The user connected to the VPN, then disconnected, so I called the relevant compilation handler. After some time, the user will start VPN again, PacketTunnelProvider will be recreated. Will it use the same class as before, and all static vars will hold their last value? Or would it create a new PacketTunnelProvider? Is it the same behavior for Network Extension vs System Extension? Is it the same behavior for macOS vs iOS? What about running threads? If I created a thread, and then I called the completion handler, will this thread continue to run? P.S If I'm adding exit(0) before 'quitting' the Packet Tunnel Provider, it will force cleaning the memory. But I guess it's not a good behavior for a System Extension to use exit(0) class PacketTunnelProvider: NEPacketTunnelProvider { static var isInitiated = false ... } override func startTunnel(options: [String : NSObject]?, completionHandler: @escaping (Error?) -> Void) { ... PacketTunnelProvider.isInitiated = true ...

I've developed a custom VPN system extension (macOS, Packet Tunnel Provider). On a first installation, the user has to allow installation of the system extension (via  Security & Privacy). My question is, what should happen when the user updates the app to a newer version - will he get the 'allow system extension installation' popup again? Or is it a 'one time popup' only?

Hi I've developed a custom VPN app for macOS (system-extension, Packet Tunnel Provider), and I have the following problem: I'm connected vie Ethernet only (not Wi-Fi). I configured on the Ethernet interface HTTP and HTTPS proxies. I'm connecting to my VPN: If I'm using a 'full tunnel' - the traffic won't pass to the Ethernet proxies, this is expected If I'm using a split tunnel - even the routes included on the tunnel will reach the Ethernet proxies, this is not expected. Am I right that this behavior is not expected? How can I fix this issue?