Post

Replies

Boosts

Views

Activity

Comment on Huge memory leakage issue with tf.keras.models.predict()
Update from me! I am fed up with TF-MACOS/METAL and have migrated to PyTorch 1.13 (also tried 1.14dev version) in Python 3.9/3.10 env. At least I could see my training is going on with MUCH MUCH MUCH MUCH LESS memory usage while using GPU (60-75% usage depending on the data) in my M1 ULTRA machine with 64c GPU. I will soon try on Python 3.11 (PyTorch is yet to support it) and update you all. Thanks, Bapi
Dec ’22
Comment on Huge memory leakage issue with tf.keras.models.predict()
when I started this thread almost 3months ago, I thought they would address the issue (was apparent based on their enthusiastic comments by dev-engineer). Now it looks like, either they do not have engineering resources to address the issue or they quickly realised managing TENSORFLOW is not their CUP of TEA (getting to the level of Google TF Engineers is a mammoth task). Grossly disappointed for spending ~$8K on a M1-Ultra Machine (probably hype does not work all the time) for TF HW.
Nov ’22
Comment on M1 GPU is extremely slow, how can I enable CPU to train my NNs?
I agree with you. Otherwise, what is point of having such a "extraordinary GPU" that can beat RTX 3090? I am stuck since last few weeks due to memory leakage issue (related to GPU) and GPUs are dead slow. Not only that, when the memory leakage reaches ~125GB out of 128GB in my Mac Studio, the training simply stops!!! I am utterly frustrated and disgusted!!! I should have gone with INTEL machine instead with a decent GPU rather than paying hefty price for this "hyped GPU" and TF-METAL. :-(
Sep ’22