Current situation.
I'm using third-party sdk make by myself with my app.
my app use UserDefaults api, and My sdk(framework) too
Recently,
apple store policy changed, apple says If you use "Userdefaults API", Include Privacy Manifest.
As a result My app including two Privacy manifest
If I create 10 SDKs, and all of these SDKs use "Userdefaults API", and one app itself also uses the "Userdefaults API", is it correct to include 11 "Privacy manifests" in this app?
General
RSS for tagPrioritize user privacy and data security in your app. Discuss best practices for data handling, user consent, and security measures to protect user information.
Post
Replies
Boosts
Views
Activity
Hello,
I am developing a smartcard CTK extension for macOS.
I have trouble to smartcard logon the first time after a reboot or a logout (e.g. when there is the text "Your password is required to enable touch id"). Trouble = I'm not asked for the PIN.
But time to time after a logout (from whatever account), I can login with the smartcard. After a lockscreen I can always login with the smartcard.
Is there an easy way to debug the logon process ?
Regards,
++dom
Hi!
In the team I work with, we develop an sdk for iOS which has support for two internal variations, one with basic capabilities and another with full ones, embedded in the same xcframework.
The thing is with the privacy manifest change in the horizon, we are wondering if the sdk in the basic version can have a manifest with some values and the manifest in the sdk full version can have a different value, since the capabilities enabled in one may have different nutrition label types values than the other.
Is that scenario feasible, or there is a different way for this situation?
Thanks
What is the difference between ASPasskeyCredentialIdentity.userName and ASPasskeyCredentialIdentity.user ?
From https://www.w3.org/TR/webauthn-2/#dom-publickeycredentialuserentity-displayname there should be only displayName.
I'm trying to set up Sign In With Apple on my .NET 7 Web App (Not sure how many people here use this). I followed the guide by Scott Brady here: https://www.scottbrady91.com/openid-connect/implementing-sign-in-with-apple-in-aspnet-core
It reaches Apple Sign In OK, authenticates, and passes back to my server, but the callback responds with this error.
OpenIdConnectProtocolException: Message contains error: 'invalid_client', error_description: 'error_description is null', error_uri: 'error_uri is null'.
Googling hasn't helped much, other than I saw a post saying to wait 48 hours, which I have now done (not that that makes sense anyway).
Any idea whats been done wrong? Code below, replacing sensitive data.
Startup.cs
.AddOpenIdConnect("apple", async options =>
{
options.Authority = "https://appleid.apple.com"; // disco doc: https://appleid.apple.com/.well-known/openid-configuration
options.ClientId = "com.rackemapp.applelogin"; // Service ID
options.CallbackPath = "/signin-apple"; // corresponding to your redirect URI
options.ResponseType = "code id_token"; // hybrid flow due to lack of PKCE support
options.ResponseMode = "form_post"; // form post due to prevent PII in the URL
options.UsePkce = false; // apple does not currently support PKCE (April 2021)
options.DisableTelemetry = true;
options.Scope.Clear(); // apple does not support the profile scope
options.Scope.Add("openid");
options.Scope.Add("email");
options.Scope.Add("name");
options.Events.OnAuthorizationCodeReceived = context =>
{
context.TokenEndpointRequest.ClientSecret = AppleTokenGenerator.CreateNewToken();
return Task.CompletedTask;
};
});
Apple Token Generator
public static class AppleTokenGenerator
{
public static string CreateNewToken()
{
const string iss = "[MyTeamId]"; // your account's team ID found in the dev portal
const string aud = "https://appleid.apple.com";
const string sub = "com.rackemapp.applelogin"; // same as client_id
var now = DateTime.UtcNow;
// contents of your .p8 file
const string privateKey = "[MyKey]";
var ecdsa = ECDsa.Create();
ecdsa?.ImportPkcs8PrivateKey(Convert.FromBase64String(privateKey), out _);
var handler = new JsonWebTokenHandler();
return handler.CreateToken(new SecurityTokenDescriptor
{
Issuer = iss,
Audience = aud,
Claims = new Dictionary<string, object> { { "sub", sub } },
Expires = now.AddMinutes(5), // expiry can be a maximum of 6 months - generate one per request or re-use until expiration
IssuedAt = now,
NotBefore = now,
SigningCredentials = new SigningCredentials(new ECDsaSecurityKey(ecdsa), SecurityAlgorithms.EcdsaSha256)
});
}
}
Also attached, images of my keys and setp in developer portal
We are trying to integrate "Sign in with Apple" and are facing an issue where all users who chose to use Apple's private relay with the hide my email feature are unable to receive any mail sent by us.
We have added our domain, mail from domain & email address to https://developer.apple.com/account/resources/services/configure and also verified the SPF. We also have DKIM setup.
We use SES as our email provider and have added its SPF as recommended aswell.
I have attached a sample delivery log from SES below.
{"notificationType":"Delivery","mail":{"timestamp":"2024-01-17T10:20:07.592Z","source":"\"Redacted\" <admin@redacted>","sourceArn":"arn:aws:ses:ap-south-1:redacted:identity/redacted","sourceIp":"34.redacted","callerIdentity":"redacted-ses","sendingAccountId":"redacted","messageId":"redacted","destination":["redacted@privaterelay.appleid.com"]},"delivery":{"timestamp":"2024-01-17T10:20:12.385Z","processingTimeMillis":4793,"recipients":["redacted@privaterelay.appleid.com"],"smtpResponse":"250 2.0.0 Ok: queued as redacted","remoteMtaIp":"redacted","reportingMTA":"redacted.smtp-out.ap-south-1.amazonses.com"}}
Hello,
we implemented Apple Sign-In in our website long ago, and it worked well.
Recently we have found a strange behaviour.
The first time we make the request to the /auth/token endpoint we get an invalid_client error.
Our client id is com.spicysparks.service.id
If we make a request another time with exactly the same data it works fine.
We noticed we get this error only when we try a newly generated client secret for the first time.
The sign in with Apple prereqs state that:
you must have an existing app in the App Store that uses Sign in with Apple
If you want to support sign in with apple on a website but do not need an iOS app specifically for that website is possible to have a "dummy" app that isn't released to the app store but will serve to support sign in with Apple?
For a security product, I wonder if security extension has a capability to catch a file during copy operation (I guess it's composed out of multiple basic ops like file read and file write).
I'd like to store the file in some quarantined temporal (let's say when someone copy file from external file system like usb/network location and copy it back once the file has properly scanned.
So far, i've used the authorization capabilities of the security extension. I wonder if there's also an option to change the target location of a file being copied ?
Thanks.
We have a game that provides a mechanism to log into the game with Sign in with Apple in a direct integration between the game and Apple (first mechanism). We also provide a mechanism to log into the game using OpenID connect with authorization from Apple but using a server in the middle that drives the process (second mechanism). It is important to mention that both mechanisms use the same oauth client.
We have been able to switch from the first mechanism to the second successfully, but there is a problem with id_token.
In the second mechanism we request the scopes "email", "openid" and "name", but in the retrieved id_token there is no information about the email. It happens for all users who previously signed in with Apple using the first mechanism (therefore there is a current link between the game and the user in AppleId). It does not happen with users who had no link between the game and the user and use the second mechanism, in this case we can retrieve the user information in the callback of the first call and the email in the id_token, as stated in the documentation.
However, if users who had a link between the game and the AppleId delete the app and then log back in using the second mechanism, then we can get the email information with the exact same request.
The request we use to obtain the authorized endpoint information (https://appleid.apple.com/auth/authorize) has these parameters:
response_mode: query
scope: email openid profile
nonce: ...
state: ...
response_type: code
Then we get the authentication code and get an id_token like this:
{
"iss":"https://appleid.apple.com",
"aud":"{aud}",
"exp":1705584621,
"iat":1705498221,
"sub":"{sub}",
"nonce":"7f-PqBoXgxeDMOEu5Ysov0FjE9GvSYfq",
"at_hash":"3kLcPBlwZP6aj_mscww5zA",
"authentication_time":1705498218,
"nonce_supported":true
}
Is there a way to retrieve the email for users who had the link and don't want to delete it or log back into the app? In the official Apple documentation it is stated that the id_token should have the email but this is not the case.
https://developer.apple.com/documentation/sign_in_with_apple/sign_in_with_apple_rest_api/authenticating_users_with_sign_in_with_apple#3383773
Hey all, so I currently have a passkey provider application on iOS that works for every RP except for google.
I found this post here saying the AttestationObject needs to be an ordered dictionary and can confirm on https://webauthn.me/debugger that my object is an ordered dictionary in the correct format.
However, google fails to create the key every time saying generically the passkey can't be saved at this time.
I'm just curious if there is something unique about google, like are they maybe whitelisting providers? Or do they require something extra that I need to send?
I can't find any other information for why google wouldn't work while everyone else does.
Thanks in advance for any help!
We develop SDKs that are distributed as XCFramework to our clients. We seek clarification regarding the necessity of attaching a Privacy Manifest, especially in instances where our SDK does not interact with data that would typically be covered under such a manifest.
Additionally, in the scenario where our SDK's primary function is the transmission and reception of data, which may potentially include personal data, are we required to declare in the Privacy Manifest that we handle personal information? This query persists even when all personal data processing is executed on the server side.
From our current understanding, based on the information available at https://developer.apple.com/support/third-party-SDK-requirements/, it appears that SDKs are only obligated to have a signature, and incorporating a Privacy Manifest may not be compulsory. We would appreciate further insight or confirmation on this matter.
For example my app is using Firebase and Alamofire.
Still I could find the Manifest files for the above SDKs.
What would be impact on app if the above api's is not updated with their Manifests.
Apple documentation is specific about the possible types of email_verified property
A string or Boolean value that indicates whether the service verifies the email. The value can either be a string ("true" or "false") or a Boolean (true or false). The system may not verify email addresses for Sign in with Apple at Work & School users, and this claim is "false" or false for those users.
Actually we made a mistake by supporting only String type and today had the very bad surprise to notice that we started receiving Bool types for the first time.
Do you have any info about changes on the API ?
Thanks
Julien
Hi Team,
I am developing a sample authPluggin which should connect to a mobile app via bluetooth connection,
So here are the scenario
Authplugin with Bluetooth connection shoould work on lockscreen+login
I have created mechanism- prepared:privillaged, main, clean:Privilaged
Calling corebluetoothmanager initiation at the time of prepared:privilaged mechanism
I have to add my auth plugin’s mechanism before loginwindow:success mechanism
But I always gets unauthorized = 3, from power state of bluetooth
Note: With App, bluetooth connection is working fine, Its giving error with authPlugin
How to achieve my ultimate goal, is this the right way?
Hello, I am creating this post to ask if there is any plan for bringing the Attestation Service support for macOS or any plans for supporting it in macOS.
We implemented it in iOS and it increased the security for our users and partners but we are evaluating deprecated macOS and keeping only Windows and linux because of this restriction on the Attestation Service...
if you recommend any other provider to attest the device please bring me some recommendations.
Are a privacy manifest and signature required for any SDKs other than those listed on the following page?
https://developer.apple.com/jp/support/third-party-SDK-requirements/
We integrate the LINE SDK for Unity (https://developers.line.biz/ja/docs/line-login-sdks/unity-sdk/overview/) in our apps.
LINE SDK for Unity uses an API corresponding to the Required Reason API on the following page.
https://developer.apple.com/documentation/bundleresources/privacy_manifest_files/describing_use_of_required_reason_api
Can you please let us know whether a privacy manifest and signature are required for this third-party SDK as well?
Thank you in advance for your attention to this matter.
Our company has a library that can be used internally.
This is being used as a .a file.
The languages are in C and C++.
C code contains stat. Is this the same stat as Apple refers to??
How do you solve this??
I am encountering an issue with accessing the system keychain on macOS [macOS 13.6.3]. When running our product, the following error message is logged:
[com.apple.securityd:secitemratelimit] Not internal release, disabling SIRL
[com.apple.securityd:keychain] System Keychain Always Supported set via feature flag to disabled
As a result, our product is unable to access the system keychain, which is impacting functionality.
Note: In many other devices this issue is not seen.
Steps to Reproduce:
The moment pkg is installed it creates a key in keychain.
For an affected device SecItemCopyMatching is returning errSecInteractionNotAllowed
Question:
Is there a way to enable the system keychain access or address the issue with the feature flag being disabled?
Are there any suggestions or recommendations for handling this case?
Any assistance or guidance on resolving this issue would be greatly appreciated. Thank you in advance for your help.
How to make an APP offer to save access credentials in the iCloud keychain