Fee app rejected as 4.3 Spam of Paid

Hi,


I'm looking for some advice here.

I've developed a pair of apps following a free/paid paradigm. I did my reasearch the app(s) are unique, I'm not cloning anyones work.

The paid version was approved for sale, but the free has been rejected because it was "found to provide different content but are identical in functionality" - to the paid app. (not true either, the paid has additional content and functionality)


It seems to me what Apple are really saying is I must use IAP and the free/paid paradigm is no longer acceptable.


I'm not sure how to manage this, perhaps the differences in functionality have been overlooked in the review and I should protest? or maybe I should just accept the policy change and get on with IAP?

Accepted Reply

As always, if you feel the rejection was in error, file an appeal via the resolution center, using the same explanation.

Replies

As always, if you feel the rejection was in error, file an appeal via the resolution center, using the same explanation.