User Profile

Posts

Posts

Post marked as solved
7 Replies
3.7k Views

4. 2 Design: Minimum Functionality, invalid for 2 months

As a practical tool, the review was repeatedly rejected, and after numerous modifications during the period, it was still invalid. The review team was contacted but it did not have any substantial effect. Already tossed crazy, in reference to the review guide and applications based on similar ideas, we have made more functional features and technical adaptations. What should I do to abandon the whole project?
Posted
by bytepai.
Last updated
.
Post not yet marked as solved
2 Replies
522 Views

Guideline 4.2 - Design - Minimum Functionality

I am a Chinese developer and I am disappointed with Apple's review. I developed a collection tool (system sharing menu) and was rejected many times. I see that the reviewer only logs in and does not make any test data. I provided videos and emails, but no results. What should I do?
Posted
by bytepai.
Last updated
.