Consider the following Objective-C class:
@interface TDWClass : NSObject
- (void)Method;
@end
If I include this in the bridging header, and try to invoke the Method from Swift its name is changed from the UpperCamelCase to just camelCase:
TDWClass().Method() // error "'Method()' has been renamed to 'method()'"
I agree that UpperCamelCase for method naming is inconsistent, however I can't see why it is crucial to the extent where the generated code mismatch the original name. Are UpperCamelCase names reserved for some API/System methods? Is there a risk of clashing with some other entities names? I can define such a method name manually in Swift just fine, so the compiler definitely can put up with it. Is there a better rationale than just "it doesn't comply naming guidelines"?
