Hi @Claude31,
Thank you for the response! After redoing the naming conventions and creating the coding keys, the first problem was my URL request, which then once I fixed (and validated by printing the response) I then couldn't seem to get the response to parse into the individual "ValueData" elements...
func getMember (completion: @escaping(Result<[ValueData], WasatchError>) -> Void){
let task = URLSession.shared.dataTask(with: resourceRequest) {(data, response, error) in
guard let jsonData = data else {
completion(.failure(.noData))
return }
do {
let wasatchResponse = try JSONDecoder().decode(WasatchResponse.self, from: jsonData)
let values = wasatchResponse.value
completion(.success(values))
}catch{
completion(.failure(.cannotProcessData))
}
print(String(data: jsonData, encoding: .utf8)!)
}
task.resume()
}
What's interesting is that last print statement still shows me the JSON structure I'm looking for, however for some reason I'm still throwing the "completion(.failure(.cannotProcessData))" statement.
Could having non-matching data types make the JSON parsing fail? (i.e. my struct defining a string when the JSON response is a bool?)
julian_jerzerick
Users receive reputation points by contributing quality content to the forums.
Posts include post and replies published on the forums.
Post authors can mark replies as Accepted to indicate successful solutions.
Apple Developer Forums admins can mark replies as Apple Recommended to indicate an approved solution
From
Heber City, UT, United States
Post
Replies
Boosts
Views
Activity
Sure! The following is what we are looking for...
{
		"@odata.context": "$metadata#Member",
		"value": [
				{
						"MemberKeyNumeric": 87205,
						"OfficeKeyNumeric": 70083,
						"MemberAORkey": "M00000628",
						"MemberAddress1": "230 West Towne Ridge Pkwy",
						"MemberAddress2": "",
						"MemberCity": "Sandy",
						"MemberFax": "",
						"MemberFirstName": "XBroker",
						"MemberFullName": "XBroker Test",
						"MemberKey": "87205",
						"MemberLastName": "Test",
						"MemberMiddleName": "",
						"MemberMlsId": "87205",
						"MemberMobilePhone": "801-676-5400",
						"MemberNationalAssociationId": "12345",
						"MemberOfficePhone": "801-676-5400",
						"MemberPostalCode": "84070",
						"MemberPreferredPhone": "801-676-5400",
						"MemberStateLicense": "0",
						"OfficeKey": "70083",
						"OfficeMlsId": "70083",
						"OfficeName": "Fake Brokerage",
						"OriginatingSystemMemberKey": "M00000628",
						"OriginatingSystemName": "UtahRealEstate.com",
						"MemberMlsAccessYN": true,
						"ModificationTimestamp": "2020-12-18T16:23:49Z",
						"OriginalEntryTimestamp": null,
						"MemberAOR": "Salt Lake Board",
						"MemberCountry": "",
						"MemberCountyOrParish": "",
						"MemberStateLicenseState": "UT",
						"MemberStateOrProvince": "UT",
						"MemberStatus": "Active",
						"MemberType": "MLS Only Broker",
						"MemberDesignation": ""
				}
		]
}
And that makes more sense, I was wondering if the types would affect the outcome. I can go through the data dictionary to ensure I am getting the correct types for each of these fields.