I am afraid this is not the reason. A protocol requirement does not define if a conforming type implements conformance as a computed property or not. {get, set} if the protocol is not a requirement for a computed priory even though it rather looks like it might be.
TS200010
Users receive reputation points by contributing quality content to the forums.
Posts include post and replies published on the forums.
Post authors can mark replies as Accepted to indicate successful solutions.
Apple Developer Forums admins can mark replies as Apple Recommended to indicate an approved solution
Last seen
User for
From
Huntingdon, England
Post
Replies
Boosts
Views
Activity
That is the reason. Thanks for posting a clear explanation.