Post not yet marked as solved
Update for anyone coming across this later:
I replied to the rejection with basically what I wrote above. They asked for screenshots and then said they'd review once I submitted a new binary. A day later they rejected with the same message. So again, I asked for clarification. I received no response, and since I had no more time to waste I resubmitted a new version with " Weather" on every view with weather data. I kept the link on the credits page. It was finally approved. I still don't know if that is what is actually required so if anyone has any other experience I would appreciate you sharing.
Post not yet marked as solved
I am getting the same error. Although I'm not using REST API. I'm using Swift.
Based on a few other replies on other similar messages, we are not alone.
My code was working fine last night. Tried today after making a few changes and I keep getting error 401. I reverted my new changes and still get the error.
I have up-to-date provisioning profile and certificates, and have WeatherKit correctly integrated (as of yesterday at least).
I went back to Apple's FlightPlanner project and even that doesn't work anymore. I made a very stripped down weatherkit program and can't get that to work either.
Here's my error message from FlightPlanner in case others are experiencing it too. Apple, please help.
Some of the Output:
2023-03-14 20:46:35.082748-0700 FlightPlanner[12854:203691] [WeatherDataService] Received authentication failure for request: 37F8FBEC-E6B5-4124-B28F-F556A90061CE:1
2023-03-14 20:46:35.085862-0700 FlightPlanner[12854:203691] [WeatherService] Encountered an error when fetching weather data subset; location=<+37.62130000,-122.37900000> +/- 0.00m (speed -1.00 mps / course -1.00) @ 3/14/23, 8:46:33 PM Pacific Daylight Time, error=invalidAuthorization(<NSHTTPURLResponse: 0x600003cfa7e0> { URL: https://weather-data.apple.com/v3/weather/en/37.621/-122.379?timezone=America/Los_Angeles&dataSets=currentWeather&country=US } { Status Code: 401, Headers {
"Access-Control-Allow-Origin" = (
"*"
);
"Cache-Control" = (
"max-age=0, no-cache, no-store"
);
Connection = (
close
);
"Content-Security-Policy" = (
"default-src 'self';"
);
Date = (
"Wed, 15 Mar 2023 03:46:34 GMT"
);
Expires = (
"Wed, 15 Mar 2023 03:46:34 GMT"
);
Pragma = (
"no-cache"
);
Server = (
Apple
);
"Strict-Transport-Security" = (
"max-age=31536000; includeSubdomains"
);
"X-Cache" = (
"TCP_MISS from a104-123-67-38.deploy.akamaitechnologies.com (AkamaiGHost/11.0.2-47096334) (-)"
);
"X-Content-Type-Options" = (
nosniff
);
"X-Frame-Options" = (
SAMEORIGIN
);
"X-REQUEST-ID" = (
"e9e27d87-209a-4c26-9048-cb7250784b99"
);
"X-XSS-Protection" = (
"1; mode=block"
);
} })
Post not yet marked as solved
OK, that’s a No then?
So … you replace the competition with your own product, remove one of the (IMHO) better features, and then tell your developers it’s to their benefit.
I, and my users, appreciated the General Purpose Summary. Sure, I can spend some time (at my skill level, a lot) to creating a function that will take the forecast and somehow cobble together a general summary. But it’s insulting to tell me it’s a “freedom”, especially when it was once so conveniently offered.
@bdesai, did you ever find a substitue for DarkSky's summary? I'm missing it too.
