Post not yet marked as solved
Click to stop watching this thread.
You have stopped watching this post. Click to start watching again.
contentPostList.repliesup-voted.tooltip
It is being discussed, that the first variant of the app will be working only with activation codes and without user accounts.The approach would be to develop a backend that delivers content for free to the aforementioned app.If a user has an activation code, he can download and locally view additional content. The codes are still free of charge and not user-bound.The app would be primarily advertised by the activation codes and their operation manual. This way there would be no implicit or explicit advertisement of purchasing methods other than the in-app purchase.https://developer.apple.com/app-store/review/guidelines/#reader-appsApps may allow a user to access previously purchased content or content subscriptions (specifically: magazines, newspapers, books, audio, music, video, access to professional databases, VoIP, cloud storage, and approved services such as classroom management apps), provided that you agree not to directly or indirectly target iOS users to use a purchasing method other than in-app purchase, and your general communications about other purchasing methods are not designed to discourage use of in-app purchase.If the activation codes would be distributed by a magazine, for example, and the app would only grant access to the magazine's content, the app could be defined as a "Reader App", correct?